Clicky

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD15

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
28
Overall
33
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front
 
Sigma SD15 front
Portability
59
Imaging
44
Features
45
Overall
44

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD15 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2010
Sigma SD15
(Full Review)
  • 5MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 3200)
  • No Video
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 750g - 144 x 107 x 81mm
  • Released February 2010
  • Superseded the Sigma SD14
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD15 Overview

Below is a extensive assessment of the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Sigma SD15, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Casio and Sigma. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and SD15 (5MP) and the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and SD15 (APS-C) offer different sensor dimensions.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The EX-Z2000 was announced at a similar time to the SD15 and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD15 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-Z2000 scores against the SD15 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Sigma SD15

 EX-Z2000 SD15 
Screen resolution461k460kClearer screen (+1k dot)

Reasons to pick Sigma SD15 over the Casio EX-Z2000

 SD15 EX-Z2000 

Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma SD15

 EX-Z2000 SD15 
ReleasedJanuary 2010February 2010Similar age
Focus manually More exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither provides Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD15 Physical Comparison

If you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z2000 provides external measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD15 has proportions of 144mm x 107mm x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 750 grams (1.65 lbs).

Check out the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Sigma SD15 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the SD15.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD15 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and SD15 is 95 and 59 respectively.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD15 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD15 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at a spec sheet. The visual below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z2000 and SD15.

As you can see, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z2000 with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Casio EX-Z2000 will give you more detail with its extra 9MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD15 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD15 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Portrait photography with Sigma SD15
35
manual focus
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
50
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW files
does not have liveview
megapixel count low (5MP)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Street photography factors
Sigma SD15 Street photography factors
55
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
heavier than competitors (152g)
52
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW files
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma SD15 as a Sports photography camera
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
38
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
comes with phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (5 megapixels)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Travel photography features
Sigma SD15 Travel photography features
62
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (26mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors (152 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
42
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse function
megapixel count low (5 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Landscape photography with Sigma SD15
47
manual focus
relatively wide (26mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not available
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse function
51
has manual focus
swap lenses (Sigma SA mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW files
does not have liveview
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (5 megapixels)
doesn't have Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Vlogging information
Sigma SD15 Vlogging information
28
relatively wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have mic socket
heavier than competitors (152 grams)
9
no video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma SD15 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma SD15
 Casio Exilim EX-Z2000Sigma SD15
General Information
Brand Name Casio Sigma
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 Sigma SD15
Type Ultracompact Advanced DSLR
Launched 2010-01-06 2010-02-20
Physical type Ultracompact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor - True II
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 20.7 x 13.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 285.7mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 5MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2
Peak resolution 4320 x 3240 2640 x 1760
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Highest enhanced ISO - 3200
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW pictures
Min enhanced ISO - 50
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) -
Max aperture f/2.8-6.5 -
Available lenses - 76
Crop factor 5.8 1.7
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 461k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 96 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.6x
Features
Min shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction -
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize - 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Highest video resolution 640x480 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152 gr (0.34 pounds) 750 gr (1.65 pounds)
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 144 x 107 x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-110 -
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $0 $1,500