Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma fp
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0432c/0432c2469e23261c9ab749c21576d50b3e114a13" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d2fe/1d2fed2caf199c62565b698420d940e61084850d" alt="Sigma fp front Sigma fp front"
84 Imaging
75 Features
79 Overall
76
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma fp Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Push to 102400)
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Released July 2019
- Updated by Sigma fp L
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma fp Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma fp, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Sigma. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and fp (25MP) and the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and fp (Full frame) use different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The EX-Z2000 was released 10 years prior to the fp which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma fp being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-Z2000 matches up against the fp when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma fp Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Sigma fp. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Sigma fp Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Sigma fp
EX-Z2000 | fp |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Casio EX-Z2000
fp | EX-Z2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2019 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 115 months |
Screen dimension | 3.2" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 2100k | ![]() | 461k | Crisper screen (+1639k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma fp
EX-Z2000 | fp | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma fp Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 has external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sigma fp has sizing of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") with a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma fp in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the fp.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3c0f/c3c0ffc37c1752558813368194aaae4f7f735458" alt="Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma fp size comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma fp size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and fp is 95 and 84 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd268/fd268d8cc4e650eab1cf1caf8a12be2398b445bb" alt="Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma fp top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma fp top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma fp Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions merely by going over specs. The pic underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z2000 and fp.
All in all, both of those cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z2000 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh trickier and the Sigma fp will offer more detail as a result of its extra 11MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z2000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9fe26/9fe2639fe1a5dd1af6b122e14d83050f0d875f31" alt="Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma fp sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma fp sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma fp Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dedf1/dedf13b78234627bd172b45edd2a750f1ef71f73" alt="Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma fp Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma fp Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma fp Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sigma fp | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Sigma |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sigma fp |
Class | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2019-07-11 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 23.9mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 858.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 25 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 6 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Leica L |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
Available lenses | - | 30 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.2 inches |
Screen resolution | 461k dots | 2,100k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | No |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) | 422 grams (0.93 lbs) |
Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-110 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 wec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $0 | $2,050 |