Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
78 Imaging
71 Features
59 Overall
66
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Launched February 2016
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) have totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z2000 was released 7 years before the Quattro H and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-Z2000 scores versus the Quattro H for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Sigma sd Quattro H. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Sigma Quattro H
| EX-Z2000 | Quattro H |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Casio EX-Z2000
| Quattro H | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2016 | January 2010 | More recent by 74 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1620k | 461k | Sharper screen (+1159k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma Quattro H
| EX-Z2000 | Quattro H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 features external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro H has sizing of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z2000 against the Quattro H.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and Quattro H is 95 and 78 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading through specs. The graphic below might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and Quattro H.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z2000 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh trickier and the Sigma Quattro H will give you extra detail as a result of its extra 31MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Sigma |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sigma sd Quattro H |
| Class | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2016-02-23 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-H |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 476.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 45MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 6200 x 4152 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.4 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.8fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | - |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | BP-61 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $1,134 |