Clicky

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H

Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
28
Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro H front
Portability
78
Imaging
72
Features
59
Overall
66

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs

Casio EX-Z2000
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2010
Sigma Quattro H
(Full Review)
  • 45MP - APS-H Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Launched February 2016
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) have totally different sensor size.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The EX-Z2000 was released 7 years before the Quattro H and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-Z2000 scores versus the Quattro H for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Sigma Quattro H

 EX-Z2000 Quattro H 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Casio EX-Z2000

 Quattro H EX-Z2000 
LaunchedFebruary 2016January 2010More recent by 74 months
Screen resolution1620k461kSharper screen (+1159k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma Quattro H

 EX-Z2000 Quattro H 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither includes Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 features external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro H has sizing of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z2000 against the Quattro H.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and Quattro H is 95 and 78 respectively.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading through specs. The graphic below might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and Quattro H.

As you can plainly see, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z2000 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh trickier and the Sigma Quattro H will give you extra detail as a result of its extra 31MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Portrait photography advice
Sigma Quattro H Portrait photography advice
34
you can focus manually
MP count good (14 megapixels)
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
83
has manual focus
sensor resolution is high (45 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-H)
includes face detection focus
exports RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 as a Street photography camera
Sigma Quattro H as a Street photography camera
55
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
more heavy than average in class (152 grams)
70
sensor size is decent (APS-H)
exports RAW files
weather proof
no moving screen
no image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 as a Sports photography camera
Sigma Quattro H as a Sports photography camera
38
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
71
sensor resolution is high (45MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-H)
includes tracking autofocus
weather proof
sensor has phase detect auto focus
max frames per second very slow (3.8 fps)
no image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Travel photography features
Sigma Quattro H Travel photography features
62
MP count good (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (26mm)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than average in class (152 grams)
does not posses selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
65
weather proof
sensor resolution is high (45 megapixels)
missing Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-Z2000
Landscape photography with Sigma Quattro H
46
you can focus manually
relatively wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (14 megapixels)
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
no Timelapse mode
75
has manual focus
change lenses (Sigma SA mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
sensor resolution is high (45 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-H)
exports RAW files
weather proof
no image stabilization
missing Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z2000 Vlogging highlights
Sigma Quattro H Vlogging highlights
28
relatively wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not posses selfie friendly display
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
no microphone support
more heavy than average in class (152g)
26
includes face detection focus
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low ( pxls)
missing external microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma Quattro H
 Casio Exilim EX-Z2000Sigma sd Quattro H
General Information
Make Casio Sigma
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 Sigma sd Quattro H
Class Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2010-01-06 2016-02-23
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-H
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 26.6 x 17.9mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 476.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 45MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4320 x 3240 6200 x 4152
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/2.8-6.5 -
Number of lenses - 76
Crop factor 5.8 1.4
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 461 thousand dot 1,620 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 3.8fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 640x480 -
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 152 grams (0.34 lb) -
Physical dimensions 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-110 BP-61
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $0 $1,134