Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
78 Imaging
71 Features
59 Overall
66
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Launched February 2016
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) have totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z2000 was released 7 years before the Quattro H and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the EX-Z2000 scores versus the Quattro H for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Sigma sd Quattro H. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Sigma Quattro H
| EX-Z2000 | Quattro H |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Casio EX-Z2000
| Quattro H | EX-Z2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2016 | January 2010 | More recent by 74 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1620k | 461k | Sharper screen (+1159k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sigma Quattro H
| EX-Z2000 | Quattro H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 features external dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro H has sizing of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z2000 against the Quattro H.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and Quattro H is 95 and 78 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading through specs. The graphic below might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and Quattro H.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z2000 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh trickier and the Sigma Quattro H will give you extra detail as a result of its extra 31MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Sigma |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sigma sd Quattro H |
| Class | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2016-02-23 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-H |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 476.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 45MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 6200 x 4152 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.4 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.8fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | - |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lb) | - |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | BP-61 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $1,134 |