Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A100
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
64 Imaging
47 Features
38 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 638g - 133 x 95 x 71mm
- Introduced July 2006
- Previous Model is Konica Minolta 5D
- Successor is Sony A550
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A100 Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sony A100, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Casio and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and A100 (10MP) and the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and A100 (APS-C) provide different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z2000 was manufactured 3 years after the A100 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A100 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief overview of how the EX-Z2000 grades versus the A100 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A100 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A100. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Sony A100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Sony A100
| EX-Z2000 | A100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2010 | July 2006 | Newer by 42 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A100 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| A100 | EX-Z2000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sony A100
| EX-Z2000 | A100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A100 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z2000 provides exterior dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sony A100 has proportions of 133mm x 95mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 2.8") along with a weight of 638 grams (1.41 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sony A100 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z2000 vs the A100.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and A100 is 95 and 64 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A100 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specifications. The image below should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and A100.
Plainly, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z2000 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Casio EX-Z2000 will resolve more detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The younger EX-Z2000 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A100 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A100 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A100 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2006-07-31 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
| Available lenses | - | 143 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lbs) | 638 gr (1.41 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 133 x 95 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 61 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.2 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 476 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-110 | NP-FM55H |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II) |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $0 | $1,000 |