Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A200
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Announced July 2008
- Newer Model is Sony A230
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A200 Overview
The following is a comprehensive assessment of the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sony A200, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Casio and Sony. There is a huge difference among the resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and A200 (10MP) and the EX-Z2000 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) have different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z2000 was introduced 18 months after the A200 making them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the EX-Z2000 scores versus the A200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A200 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Sony A200
| EX-Z2000 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2010 |  | July 2008 | Newer by 18 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Casio EX-Z2000
| A200 | EX-Z2000 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sony A200
| EX-Z2000 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z2000 comes with outer dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony A200 has specifications of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sony A200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z2000 against the A200.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z2000 and A200 is 95 and 66 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions merely by checking out a spec sheet. The pic underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and A200.
Clearly, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z2000 with its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Casio EX-Z2000 will produce more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images more aggressively. The newer EX-Z2000 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony A200 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2010-01-06 | 2008-07-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lb) | 572 grams (1.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 521 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $0 | $100 |