Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T90
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
![Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000/Casio-EX-Z2000-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T90/Sony-T90-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T90 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 148g - 94 x 57 x 15mm
- Released February 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T90 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Sony T90, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Casio and Sony. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the T90 (12MP) is very comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The EX-Z2000 was manufactured 11 months after the T90 so they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-Z2000 grades against the T90 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T90 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery & Sony T90 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Sony T90
EX-Z2000 | T90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | ![]() | February 2009 | Newer by 11 months |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony T90 over the Casio EX-Z2000
T90 | EX-Z2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sony T90
EX-Z2000 | T90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T90 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera often, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 provides exterior measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony T90 has sizing of 94mm x 57mm x 15mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.6") along with a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z2000 versus Sony T90 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z2000 against the T90.
![Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T90 size comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T90 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T90-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and T90 is 95 and 96 respectively.
![Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T90 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T90 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T90-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T90 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions simply by going through specs. The picture here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z2000 and T90.
All in all, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Casio EX-Z2000 to show more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more modern EX-Z2000 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T90 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T90 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T90-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T90 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T90 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T90-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T90 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Sony |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T90 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2010-01-06 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lb) | 148 gr (0.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 94 x 57 x 15mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-110 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $0 | $259 |