Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T900
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
![Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000/Casio-EX-Z2000-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T900/Sony-T900-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
35 Features
30 Overall
33
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Released February 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T900 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T900, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Sony. The resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the T900 (12MP) is fairly close and both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The EX-Z2000 was brought out 11 months later than the T900 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-Z2000 scores against the T900 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T900 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Sony T900
EX-Z2000 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2010 | ![]() | February 2009 | More recent by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Casio EX-Z2000
T900 | EX-Z2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 461k | Clearer display (+461k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sony T900
EX-Z2000 | T900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z2000 offers exterior dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T900 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z2000 versus the T900.
![Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T900 size comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T900 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T900-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and T900 is 95 and 96 respectively.
![Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T900-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by researching a spec sheet. The visual here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and T900.
Clearly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Casio EX-Z2000 to render more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The more recent EX-Z2000 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
![Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T900-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-T900-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony T900 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Sony |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-10.0 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3.5" |
Resolution of screen | 461 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lb) | 143 grams (0.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-110 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $0 | $300 |