Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony W350
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
![Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000/Casio-EX-Z2000-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W350.jpg)
97 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony W350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 91 x 52 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony W350 Overview
In this write-up, we will be comparing the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony W350, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Sony. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and the W350 (14MP) is pretty well matched and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The EX-Z2000 was announced within a month of the W350 and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-Z2000 matches up against the W350 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony W350 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Sony W350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Sony W350
EX-Z2000 | W350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W350 over the Casio EX-Z2000
W350 | EX-Z2000 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Sony W350
EX-Z2000 | W350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2010 | ![]() | January 2010 | Similar generation |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony W350 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z2000 enjoys exterior dimensions of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony W350 has measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony W350 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-Z2000 compared to the W350.
![Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony W350 size comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony W350 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W350-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z2000 and W350 is 95 and 97 respectively.
![Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony W350 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony W350 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W350-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony W350 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes purely by looking at a spec sheet. The pic underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z2000 and W350.
Clearly, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution and you should expect similar quality of photos but you should always consider the production date of the products into consideration.
![Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony W350 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony W350 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W350-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony W350 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony W350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony W350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z2000-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-W350-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Sony W350 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Sony |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2010-01-06 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) | 117 gr (0.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 91 x 52 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-110 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $0 | $200 |