Casio EX-Z270 vs Casio EX-Z800
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Casio EX-Z270 vs Casio EX-Z800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Released August 2010
Casio EX-Z270 vs Casio EX-Z800 Overview
The following is a in depth comparison of the Casio EX-Z270 versus Casio EX-Z800, both Ultracompact cameras and both of them are offered by Casio. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and EX-Z800 (14MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and EX-Z800 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z270 was unveiled 19 months earlier than the EX-Z800 making them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-Z270 scores vs the EX-Z800 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Casio EX-Z800 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 & Casio Exilim EX-Z800. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery & Casio EX-Z800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Casio EX-Z800
EX-Z270 | EX-Z800 |
---|
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Casio EX-Z270
EX-Z800 | EX-Z270 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2010 | January 2009 | Newer by 19 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Display resolution | 230k | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Casio EX-Z800
EX-Z270 | EX-Z800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal display size | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Casio EX-Z800 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z270 offers outside measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Casio EX-Z800 has sizing of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z270 versus Casio EX-Z800 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z270 and the EX-Z800.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z270 and EX-Z800 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Casio EX-Z800 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by checking out specifications. The pic here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z270 and EX-Z800.
To sum up, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z270 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Casio EX-Z800 will show greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z270 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Casio EX-Z800 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z270 vs Casio EX-Z800 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Casio |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2010-08-03 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/3.2-5.9 |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 115 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash options | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 111 gr (0.24 lb) | 124 gr (0.27 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-80 | NP-120 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $0 | $150 |