Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm F200EXR
96 Imaging
32 Features
22 Overall
28
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Introduced April 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Casio EX-Z270 and Fujifilm F200EXR, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) is very comparable but the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") come with different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z270 was manufactured 3 months before the Fujifilm F200EXR so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm F200EXR being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-Z270 grades against the Fujifilm F200EXR in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 & Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery & Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| EX-Z270 | Fujifilm F200EXR |
|---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Casio EX-Z270
| Fujifilm F200EXR | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Fujifilm F200EXR
| EX-Z270 | Fujifilm F200EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2009 | April 2009 | Same age | |
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither provides Touch display |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z270 provides outer measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Fujifilm F200EXR has dimensions of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z270 and Fujifilm F200EXR in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z270 versus the Fujifilm F200EXR.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z270 and Fujifilm F200EXR is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizes simply by checking out specifications. The pic below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z270 and Fujifilm F200EXR.
To sum up, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z270 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Fujifilm F200EXR will show greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm F200EXR Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2009-04-30 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/1.6" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 8 x 6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 48.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/3.3-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 4.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 115k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 111g (0.24 pounds) | 205g (0.45 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | NP-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $0 | $350 |