Clicky

Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm S4200

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
22
Overall
28
Casio Exilim EX-Z270 front
 
Fujifilm FinePix S4200 front
Portability
67
Imaging
37
Features
37
Overall
37

Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm S4200 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z270
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
  • 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
  • Released January 2009
Fujifilm S4200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 543g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm S4200 Overview

Below is a in depth review of the Casio EX-Z270 versus Fujifilm S4200, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and Fujifilm S4200 (14MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and Fujifilm S4200 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The EX-Z270 was announced 4 years prior to the Fujifilm S4200 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm S4200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick overview of how the EX-Z270 matches up vs the Fujifilm S4200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Fujifilm S4200

 EX-Z270 Fujifilm S4200 

Reasons to pick Fujifilm S4200 over the Casio EX-Z270

 Fujifilm S4200 EX-Z270 
IntroducedJanuary 2012January 2009More recent by 36 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution230k115kCrisper screen (+115k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Fujifilm S4200

 EX-Z270 Fujifilm S4200 
Manually focus Lack of manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm S4200 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z270 enjoys exterior dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm S4200 has sizing of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") with a weight of 543 grams (1.20 lbs).

Check out the Casio EX-Z270 versus Fujifilm S4200 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z270 versus the Fujifilm S4200.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm S4200 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z270 and Fujifilm S4200 is 96 and 67 respectively.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm S4200 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm S4200 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z270 and Fujifilm S4200.

Clearly, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z270 with its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Fujifilm S4200 will provide more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots more aggressively. The older EX-Z270 will be behind in sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm S4200 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm S4200 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm S4200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Portrait photography advice
Fujifilm S4200 Portrait photography advice
19
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW format
35
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
supports face detection autofocus
no manual focus
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-Z270
Street photography with Fujifilm S4200
57
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW format
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
heavier than competition (543g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Sports photography advice
Fujifilm S4200 Sports photography advice
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
47
great zoom range (24-576mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Travel photography details
Fujifilm S4200 Travel photography details
58
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.6)
54
megapixel count good (14MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
great zoom (576mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (543g)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Landscape photography highlights
Fujifilm S4200 Landscape photography highlights
31
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.6)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.5")
doesn't have RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse mode
41
decently wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Vlogging factors
Fujifilm S4200 Vlogging factors
29
really wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.6)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have microphone port
24
decently wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic port
heavier than competition (543g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm S4200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z270 and Fujifilm S4200
 Casio Exilim EX-Z270Fujifilm FinePix S4200
General Information
Make Casio FujiFilm
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z270 Fujifilm FinePix S4200
Class Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2009-01-08 2012-01-05
Body design Ultracompact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Max enhanced ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 24-576mm (24.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.6-7.8 f/3.1-5.9
Macro focus range - 2cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 115k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology - TFT color LCD monitor
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder coverage - 97 percent
Features
Min shutter speed 1/2s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed - 1.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 7.00 m (Wide: 40 cm–7.0 m / Tele: 2.5m–3.6 m)
Flash modes - Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG H.264, Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 111g (0.24 pounds) 543g (1.20 pounds)
Physical dimensions 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 photographs
Battery form - AA
Battery model NP-80 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $0 $200