Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm S5 Pro
96 Imaging
32 Features
22 Overall
28
55 Imaging
44 Features
43 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm S5 Pro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Nikon F Mount
- 920g - 147 x 113 x 74mm
- Introduced July 2007
- Previous Model is Fujifilm S3 Pro
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm S5 Pro Overview
The following is a extensive assessment of the Casio EX-Z270 versus Fujifilm S5 Pro, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Pro DSLR by competitors Casio and FujiFilm. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and Fujifilm S5 Pro (6MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and Fujifilm S5 Pro (APS-C) feature different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z270 was introduced 19 months after the Fujifilm S5 Pro making the cameras a generation away from one another. The two cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm S5 Pro being a Large SLR camera.
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-Z270 matches up against the Fujifilm S5 Pro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm S5 Pro Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 and Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery and Fujifilm S5 Pro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Fujifilm S5 Pro
| EX-Z270 | Fujifilm S5 Pro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2009 | July 2007 | Newer by 19 months | |
| Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm S5 Pro over the Casio EX-Z270
| Fujifilm S5 Pro | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display resolution | 230k | 115k | Sharper display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Fujifilm S5 Pro
| EX-Z270 | Fujifilm S5 Pro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm S5 Pro Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z270 enjoys outside measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm S5 Pro has dimensions of 147mm x 113mm x 74mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 2.9") having a weight of 920 grams (2.03 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z270 versus Fujifilm S5 Pro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z270 compared to the Fujifilm S5 Pro.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z270 and Fujifilm S5 Pro is 96 and 55 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm S5 Pro Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by looking at a spec sheet. The picture here may give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z270 and Fujifilm S5 Pro.
Clearly, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z270 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh more difficult and the Casio EX-Z270 will resolve more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images much more aggressively. The newer EX-Z270 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm S5 Pro Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm S5 Pro Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | FujiFilm |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Fujifilm FinePix S5 Pro |
| Type | Ultracompact | Pro DSLR |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2007-07-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Large SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 23 x 15.5mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 356.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4256 x 2848 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Nikon F |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 309 |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 115 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.63x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 12.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Front curtain, Rear curtain, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 111 gr (0.24 lb) | 920 gr (2.03 lb) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 147 x 113 x 74mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 65 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 448 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-80 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 to 20 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | Compact Flash (Type I or II) |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $548 |