Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm XQ2
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5da/be5da3e0d8c97d11812a2fa106de287a4829ce6f" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z270 front Casio Exilim EX-Z270 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b34a8/b34a85a6f02774bb060e6613c362326f6da96111" alt="Fujifilm XQ2 front Fujifilm XQ2 front"
92 Imaging
39 Features
57 Overall
46
Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 2/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 206g - 100 x 59 x 33mm
- Released January 2015
- Earlier Model is Fujifilm XQ1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm XQ2, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Casio and FujiFilm. The resolution of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and the Fujifilm XQ2 (12MP) is relatively close but the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and Fujifilm XQ2 (2/3") offer totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The EX-Z270 was manufactured 7 years prior to the Fujifilm XQ2 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-Z270 grades against the Fujifilm XQ2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 and Fujifilm XQ2. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery and Fujifilm XQ2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Fujifilm XQ2
EX-Z270 | Fujifilm XQ2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XQ2 over the Casio EX-Z270
Fujifilm XQ2 | EX-Z270 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2015 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 73 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 115k | Sharper screen (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Fujifilm XQ2
EX-Z270 | Fujifilm XQ2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z270 enjoys physical dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Fujifilm XQ2 has proportions of 100mm x 59mm x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm XQ2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z270 against the Fujifilm XQ2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d264/6d264384f91cfe515f2496e613c936ae85daf851" alt="Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm XQ2 size comparison Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm XQ2 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z270 and Fujifilm XQ2 is 96 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96882/96882a047d34c3a5b270347af076fbcc0b562e8b" alt="Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm XQ2 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm XQ2 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements merely by researching technical specs. The photograph here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z270 and Fujifilm XQ2.
As you can tell, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z270 featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Fujifilm XQ2 will result in extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-Z270 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8456/b84561dd06ebabdd3ca6c0075c2241df290e7237" alt="Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm XQ2 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm XQ2 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77393/7739324d14de520748681483165c94b172306f9b" alt="Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-Z270 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Fujifilm XQ2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | FujiFilm |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Fujifilm XQ2 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2015-01-14 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | EXR Processor II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS X-TRANS II |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 2/3" |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 8.8 x 6.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 58.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 4.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 115k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 7.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | - | Auto, on, off, slow syncho |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 111 gr (0.24 lb) | 206 gr (0.45 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 100 x 59 x 33mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-80 | NP-48 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $0 | $299 |