Clicky

Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak M320

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
22
Overall
28
Casio Exilim EX-Z270 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23

Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z270
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
  • 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2009
Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Released January 2009
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak M320 Overview

The following is a in-depth review of the Casio EX-Z270 and Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. The image resolution of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and the M320 (9MP) is pretty similar and they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.5").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The EX-Z270 was unveiled within a month of the M320 which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-Z270 matches up versus the M320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Kodak M320

 EX-Z270 M320 

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Casio EX-Z270

 M320 EX-Z270 
Screen resolution230k115kSharper screen (+115k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Kodak M320

 EX-Z270 M320 
ReleasedJanuary 2009January 2009Similar generation
Manual focus No manual focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension2.7"2.7"Identical screen dimensions
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z270 features physical measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Kodak M320 has dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

See the Casio EX-Z270 and Kodak M320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the EX-Z270 and the M320.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak M320 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z270 and M320 is 96 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak M320 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specifications. The picture underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z270 and M320.

Plainly, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Casio EX-Z270 to offer you greater detail having an extra 1MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots much more aggressively.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak M320 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak M320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Portrait photography factors
Kodak M320 Portrait photography factors
19
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
has no RAW support
19
manual focus not available
no manual mode
can't use external flash
resolution not great (9 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
has no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Street photography info
Kodak M320 Street photography info
57
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
has no RAW support
47
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
has no RAW support
heavier than others in class (155g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Sports photography highlights
Kodak M320 Sports photography highlights
26
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
has no phase detect AF
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
resolution not great (9MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
has no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Travel photography information
Kodak M320 Travel photography information
58
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse function
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.6)
50
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than others in class (155 grams)
resolution not great (9MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Landscape photography factors
Kodak M320 Landscape photography factors
31
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.6)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.5")
has no RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
22
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual mode
no image stabilization
resolution not great (9 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.5")
has no RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 as a Vlogging camera
Kodak M320 as a Vlogging camera
29
fairly wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f2.6)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external microphone jack
22
wide angle not fantastic (34mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
missing mic port
heavier than others in class (155 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak M320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z270 and Kodak M320
 Casio Exilim EX-Z270Kodak EasyShare M320
General Information
Brand Casio Kodak
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z270 Kodak EasyShare M320
Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2009-01-08 2009-01-08
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.5"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 9 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 3472 x 2604
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 34-102mm (3.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.6-7.8 f/2.8-5.1
Macro focusing range - 10cm
Focal length multiplier 6.3 6.3
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 115k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 1/2 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1400 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 3.00 m
Flash modes - Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 111 grams (0.24 lbs) 155 grams (0.34 lbs)
Dimensions 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-80 KLIC-7001
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Price at release $0 $39