Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak Touch
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5da/be5da3e0d8c97d11812a2fa106de287a4829ce6f" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z270 front Casio Exilim EX-Z270 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ded3/1ded3e1e0179a1da59d37bb7a9cb573d351b5faf" alt="Kodak EasyShare Touch front Kodak EasyShare Touch front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak Touch Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Announced January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak Touch Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Casio EX-Z270 versus Kodak Touch, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Casio and Kodak. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and Touch (14MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and Touch (1/3") have different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The EX-Z270 was revealed 24 months before the Touch making them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-Z270 grades against the Touch when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak Touch Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 and Kodak EasyShare Touch. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery and Kodak Touch Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Kodak Touch
EX-Z270 | Touch |
---|
Reasons to pick Kodak Touch over the Casio EX-Z270
Touch | EX-Z270 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 24 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 115k | Crisper display (+345k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Kodak Touch
EX-Z270 | Touch | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak Touch Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z270 comes with exterior measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Kodak Touch has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z270 versus Kodak Touch in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z270 against the Touch.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5797/e5797e319126f92572060fee4889f9d6a524815f" alt="Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak Touch size comparison Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak Touch size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z270 and Touch is 96 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f0d5/7f0d5ce721a2d276ba11602173d91794776849bc" alt="Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak Touch top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak Touch top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak Touch Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions only by looking through a spec sheet. The image underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z270 and Touch.
As you can see, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z270 having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Kodak Touch will result in more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z270 will be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1fbbb/1fbbbba27fd96cc3448831256261f2b45ae45154" alt="Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak Touch sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak Touch sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak Touch Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac436/ac4365257c4c8db8cefe519056fa88b3b8b26e12" alt="Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak Touch Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak Touch Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-Z270 vs Kodak Touch Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Kodak EasyShare Touch | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Kodak |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Kodak EasyShare Touch |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2009-01-08 | 2011-01-04 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/3" |
Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 17.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | - |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 7.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 115k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.20 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 111 grams (0.24 lb) | 150 grams (0.33 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-80 | KLIC-7006 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $0 | $100 |