Casio EX-Z270 vs Nikon S6900
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
93 Imaging
41 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z270 vs Nikon S6900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 181g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2015
Casio EX-Z270 vs Nikon S6900 Overview
In this write-up, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-Z270 and Nikon S6900, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Nikon. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and S6900 (16MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and S6900 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z270 was announced 7 years before the S6900 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a short summary of how the EX-Z270 matches up vs the S6900 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Nikon S6900 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 & Nikon Coolpix S6900. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery & Nikon S6900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Nikon S6900
EX-Z270 | S6900 |
---|
Reasons to pick Nikon S6900 over the Casio EX-Z270
S6900 | EX-Z270 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2015 | January 2009 | Fresher by 74 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 115k | Sharper screen (+345k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Nikon S6900
EX-Z270 | S6900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Nikon S6900 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you should think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z270 has external dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Nikon S6900 has sizing of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z270 and Nikon S6900 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z270 versus the S6900.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z270 and S6900 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Nikon S6900 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing just by going over a spec sheet. The visual below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z270 and S6900.
As you can see, both of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z270 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Nikon S6900 will offer you more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older EX-Z270 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Nikon S6900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z270 vs Nikon S6900 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Nikon Coolpix S6900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Nikon |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Nikon Coolpix S6900 |
Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/3.3-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | - | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 2.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 111g (0.24 pounds) | 181g (0.40 pounds) |
Dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 180 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-80 | EN-EL19 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $0 | $190 |