Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus TG-860
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched February 2015
- Successor is Olympus TG-870
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-Z270 versus Olympus TG-860, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and TG-860 (16MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and TG-860 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z270 was released 7 years prior to the TG-860 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the EX-Z270 scores vs the TG-860 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery & Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Olympus TG-860
| EX-Z270 | TG-860 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Casio EX-Z270
| TG-860 | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2015 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 74 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Olympus TG-860
| EX-Z270 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z270 enjoys external measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-860 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z270 versus Olympus TG-860 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z270 against the TG-860.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z270 and TG-860 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to picture the gap in sensor sizing just by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z270 and TG-860.
Clearly, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z270 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus TG-860 will result in more detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The older EX-Z270 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2015-02-06 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 111g (0.24 lb) | 224g (0.49 lb) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-80 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $0 | $279 |