Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
96 Imaging
32 Features
22 Overall
28
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly comparable but the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor size.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe EX-Z270 was revealed 4 years before the XZ-2 iHS and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-Z270 grades versus the XZ-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| EX-Z270 | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Casio EX-Z270
| XZ-2 iHS | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | December 2012 | January 2009 | Fresher by 48 months | |
| Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 115k | Crisper display (+805k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| EX-Z270 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z270 enjoys outside measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z270 versus the XZ-2 iHS.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z270 and XZ-2 iHS is 96 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to see the difference in sensor sizing merely by seeing specifications. The visual underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z270 and XZ-2 iHS.
Plainly, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z270 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will produce extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The older EX-Z270 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z270 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 115 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 111g (0.24 pounds) | 346g (0.76 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-80 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $450 |