Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh CX1
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2009
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh CX1, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and the CX1 (9MP) is relatively similar but the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and CX1 (1/2.3") boast different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z270 was brought out very close to the CX1 and they are both of a similar age. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the EX-Z270 matches up versus the CX1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 & Ricoh CX1. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Ricoh CX1
| EX-Z270 | CX1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Casio EX-Z270
| CX1 | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Ricoh CX1
| EX-Z270 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2009 |  | February 2009 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z270 provides exterior measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh CX1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z270 against the CX1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z270 and CX1 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specs. The visual here may provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z270 and CX1.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z270 due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Casio EX-Z270 will offer you more detail having its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Ricoh CX1 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2009-02-19 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 115 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 111 gr (0.24 lb) | 180 gr (0.40 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $0 | $299 |