Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh CX2
96 Imaging
32 Features
22 Overall
28
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced August 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Casio EX-Z270 versus Ricoh CX2, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and the CX2 (9MP) is relatively similar but the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and CX2 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z270 was revealed 7 months prior to the CX2 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a quick view of how the EX-Z270 grades against the CX2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 & Ricoh CX2. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Ricoh CX2
| EX-Z270 | CX2 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Casio EX-Z270
| CX2 | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2009 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 7 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Ricoh CX2
| EX-Z270 | CX2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to travel with your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z270 features outer dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z270 versus Ricoh CX2 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z270 and the CX2.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z270 and CX2 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor dimensions only by reviewing specs. The picture here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z270 and CX2.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z270 using its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Casio EX-Z270 will offer extra detail because of its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z270 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Ricoh CX2 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Ricoh CX2 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2009-08-20 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 115k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 111 gr (0.24 lb) | 185 gr (0.41 lb) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $0 | $341 |