Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital III
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5da/be5da3e0d8c97d11812a2fa106de287a4829ce6f" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z270 front Casio Exilim EX-Z270 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0394/c039434b1259b0983aa2fa353205f299c35090eb" alt="Ricoh GR Digital III front Ricoh GR Digital III front"
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 208g - 109 x 59 x 26mm
- Released July 2009
- Renewed by Ricoh GR Digital IV
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Casio EX-Z270 versus Ricoh GR Digital III, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and the GR Digital III (10MP) is pretty comparable but the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and GR Digital III (1/1.7") boast different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The EX-Z270 was revealed 6 months before the GR Digital III so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital III being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-Z270 grades vs the GR Digital III when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 & Ricoh GR Digital III. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Ricoh GR Digital III
EX-Z270 | GR Digital III |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital III over the Casio EX-Z270
GR Digital III | EX-Z270 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 115k | Crisper screen (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Ricoh GR Digital III
EX-Z270 | GR Digital III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2009 | ![]() | July 2009 | Same age |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z270 has got external measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital III has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z270 versus Ricoh GR Digital III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z270 compared to the GR Digital III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08da0/08da0a9020b6288724a56d9d3c2bfe4bfa838cec" alt="Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital III size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z270 and GR Digital III is 96 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c2a65/c2a65f05e17816420d09a19a9351af4b0cc97e03" alt="Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital III top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements only by checking out technical specs. The photograph here might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z270 and GR Digital III.
As you can tell, both of the cameras feature the identical megapixels albeit different sensor measurements. The EX-Z270 provides the smaller sensor which will make achieving shallow DOF more challenging.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0511f/0511f4e6037ada6fc1ced43ee0cd4494216478a0" alt="Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital III sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/283cb/283cb919e5e2f5372e96afd90b61a296be8b720d" alt="Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital III Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Ricoh GR Digital III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Ricoh GR Digital III |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 115 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 1 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 111g (0.24 lb) | 208g (0.46 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 109 x 59 x 26mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $0 | $399 |