Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Released September 2011
- Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is pretty similar but the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") come with different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z270 was revealed 3 years earlier than the GR Digital IV which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the EX-Z270 scores versus the GR Digital IV for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
| EX-Z270 | GR Digital IV |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Casio EX-Z270
| GR Digital IV | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2011 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 32 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+1115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
| EX-Z270 | GR Digital IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z270 enjoys external dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z270 compared to the GR Digital IV.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z270 and GR Digital IV is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading a spec sheet. The picture here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z270 and GR Digital IV.
Clearly, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact resolution albeit different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z270 contains the tinier sensor which should make obtaining bokeh harder. The more aged EX-Z270 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2011-09-15 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/1.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 115k dot | 1,230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 1s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 111 gr (0.24 lbs) | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 390 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-80 | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $599 |