Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
96 Imaging
32 Features
22 Overall
28
69 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Introduced February 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-Z270 versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) use different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z270 was brought out 4 years before the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-Z270 grades versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
| EX-Z270 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Casio EX-Z270
| GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 | January 2009 | Fresher by 37 months | |
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 115k | Sharper screen (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
| EX-Z270 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z270 comes with physical measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has sizing of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") having a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z270 versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z270 versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z270 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 96 and 69 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing only by checking specs. The photograph below might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z270 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
All in all, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z270 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will resolve greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The older EX-Z270 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2012-02-02 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 180s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 111g (0.24 lb) | 550g (1.21 lb) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-80 | DB-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $0 | $871 |