Clicky

Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

Portability
96
Imaging
32
Features
22
Overall
28
Casio Exilim EX-Z270 front
 
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
Portability
69
Imaging
56
Features
45
Overall
51

Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z270
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
  • 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
  • Released January 2009
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Introduced February 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview

In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-Z270 versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) use different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-Z270 was brought out 4 years before the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-Z270 grades versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 EX-Z270 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Casio EX-Z270

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 EX-Z270 
IntroducedFebruary 2012January 2009Fresher by 37 months
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k115kSharper screen (+805k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 EX-Z270 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z270 comes with physical measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has sizing of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") having a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).

Check out the Casio EX-Z270 versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z270 versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z270 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 96 and 69 respectively.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing only by checking specs. The photograph below might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z270 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

All in all, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z270 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will resolve greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The older EX-Z270 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-Z270
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
19
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
73
has manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
has face detection focusing
saves RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-Z270
Street photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
56
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
55
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than competitors (550g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Sports photography info
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sports photography info
26
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
lacks phase detect AF
48
MP count decent (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-Z270
Travel photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
58
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse function
sensor resolution low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
58
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (24mm)
more heavy than competitors (550g)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Landscape photography advice
31
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
62
has manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
lack of image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Vlogging details
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Vlogging details
29
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone jack
24
reasonably wide (24mm)
has face detection focusing
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone port
more heavy than competitors (550g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z270 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
 Casio Exilim EX-Z270Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
General Information
Company Casio Ricoh
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z270 Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Category Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2009-01-08 2012-02-02
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.5" APS-C
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 3648 x 2736 4928 x 3264
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 24-85mm (3.5x)
Highest aperture f/2.6-7.8 f/3.5-5.5
Focal length multiplier 6.3 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7" 3"
Resolution of screen 115 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1/2s 180s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/3200s
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash options - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 111g (0.24 lb) 550g (1.21 lb)
Dimensions 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 400 photographs
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-80 DB-90
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch price $0 $871