Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-30
96 Imaging
32 Features
22 Overall
28
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced October 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Below is a thorough comparison of the Casio EX-Z270 and Ricoh WG-30, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and WG-30 (16MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and WG-30 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z270 was released 6 years prior to the WG-30 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-30 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-Z270 scores against the WG-30 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 and Ricoh WG-30. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery and Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Ricoh WG-30
| EX-Z270 | WG-30 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Casio EX-Z270
| WG-30 | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | October 2014 | January 2009 | More recent by 70 months | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Ricoh WG-30
| EX-Z270 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z270 has exterior measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z270 and Ricoh WG-30 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z270 versus the WG-30.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z270 and WG-30 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing technical specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z270 and WG-30.
As you have seen, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z270 due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Ricoh WG-30 will result in extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-Z270 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Ricoh WG-30 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2014-10-09 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 115k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 111g (0.24 lbs) | 192g (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-80 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $0 | $428 |