Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-4
96 Imaging
32 Features
22 Overall
28
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-Z270 and Ricoh WG-4, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and WG-4 (16MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and WG-4 (1/2.3") posses different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z270 was unveiled 6 years before the WG-4 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-Z270 scores vs the WG-4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 & Ricoh WG-4. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Ricoh WG-4
| EX-Z270 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Casio EX-Z270
| WG-4 | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 | January 2009 | More recent by 61 months | |
| Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 115k | Crisper screen (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Ricoh WG-4
| EX-Z270 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z270 enjoys physical dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has proportions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z270 and Ricoh WG-4 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z270 against the WG-4.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z270 and WG-4 is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic below may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z270 and WG-4.
As you can see, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z270 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Ricoh WG-4 will produce more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-Z270 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 115k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 111 gr (0.24 lb) | 230 gr (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-80 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $0 | $330 |