Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-70
96 Imaging
32 Features
22 Overall
28
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released February 2020
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-80
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-70, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and WG-70 (16MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and WG-70 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z270 was manufactured 12 years earlier than the WG-70 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-Z270 matches up vs the WG-70 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 & Ricoh WG-70. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Ricoh WG-70
| EX-Z270 | WG-70 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Casio EX-Z270
| WG-70 | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2020 | January 2009 | Newer by 134 months | |
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 230k | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Ricoh WG-70
| EX-Z270 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same display size | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z270 has external dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-70 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-70 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z270 versus the WG-70.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z270 and WG-70 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by researching specs. The image here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z270 and WG-70.
All in all, each of these cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z270 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Ricoh WG-70 will render more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z270 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z270 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2020-02-04 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 115k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | - | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 111g (0.24 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-80 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $0 | $280 |