Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung GX-10
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5da/be5da3e0d8c97d11812a2fa106de287a4829ce6f" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z270 front Casio Exilim EX-Z270 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc7ea/dc7eae8dfcdf015ab3f3221abf91ebb5af0f0aea" alt="Samsung GX-10 front Samsung GX-10 front"
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Released September 2006
- New Model is Samsung GX-20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung GX-10, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and the GX-10 (10MP) is relatively close but the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and GX-10 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The EX-Z270 was brought out 2 years after the GX-10 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the EX-Z270 matches up versus the GX-10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 and Samsung GX-10. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery and Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Samsung GX-10
EX-Z270 | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2009 | ![]() | September 2006 | Newer by 28 months |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Casio EX-Z270
GX-10 | EX-Z270 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 210k | ![]() | 115k | Crisper screen (+95k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung GX-10
EX-Z270 | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z270 has external measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Samsung GX-10 has specifications of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") with a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung GX-10 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-Z270 and the GX-10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc8c5/cc8c53dde370332110b4476d28666b4aeebca030" alt="Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung GX-10 size comparison Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung GX-10 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z270 and GX-10 is 96 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/faa5f/faa5fb2ea6b406dc06f597b51efbc1f15f447f5f" alt="Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung GX-10 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung GX-10 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specs. The pic here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z270 and GX-10.
All in all, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact MP albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The EX-Z270 has got the smaller sensor which is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging. The younger EX-Z270 will have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2006f/2006f199b8c75569b0f58ee282e19ed9f62cb58c" alt="Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung GX-10 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung GX-10 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/652b9/652b9f46c03b8dabe508aa660ca5c563b629d3a1" alt="Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung GX-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung GX-10 |
Category | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Released | 2009-01-08 | 2006-09-21 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 115 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 111 grams (0.24 pounds) | 793 grams (1.75 pounds) |
Dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $0 | $850 |