Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
96 Imaging
32 Features
22 Overall
28
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Announced August 2012
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Overview
In this article, we are analyzing the Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and Galaxy Camera 3G (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z270 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the Galaxy Camera 3G which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G being a Compact camera.
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the EX-Z270 matches up against the Galaxy Camera 3G in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
| EX-Z270 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 115k | 0k | Sharper display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Casio EX-Z270
| Galaxy Camera 3G | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2012 | January 2009 | More modern by 44 months | |
| Display sizing | 4.8" | 2.7" | Larger display (+2.1") | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
| EX-Z270 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z270 offers outside measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G has proportions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z270 vs the Galaxy Camera 3G.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z270 and Galaxy Camera 3G is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes only by seeing a spec sheet. The image underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z270 and Galaxy Camera 3G.
As you can see, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z270 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G will show more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z270 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2012-08-29 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | - |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 4.8 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 115k dot | 0k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/2s | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | - | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 111g (0.24 lbs) | 305g (0.67 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $0 | $606 |