Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung NX3000
96 Imaging
32 Features
22 Overall
28
89 Imaging
62 Features
62 Overall
62
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
- Released May 2014
- Previous Model is Samsung NX2000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung NX3000 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Casio EX-Z270 versus Samsung NX3000, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and NX3000 (20MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and NX3000 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z270 was brought out 6 years earlier than the NX3000 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung NX3000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-Z270 matches up versus the NX3000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung NX3000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 & Samsung NX3000. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery & Samsung NX3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Samsung NX3000
| EX-Z270 | NX3000 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Casio EX-Z270
| NX3000 | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2014 | January 2009 | Newer by 65 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 461k | 115k | Sharper display (+346k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung NX3000
| EX-Z270 | NX3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z270 provides external measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX3000 has proportions of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z270 versus Samsung NX3000 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you select at that moment. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z270 vs the NX3000.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z270 and NX3000 is 96 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions purely by going through specifications. The picture here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z270 and NX3000.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z270 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting bokeh harder and the Samsung NX3000 will produce greater detail having its extra 10MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z270 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung NX3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung NX3000 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2014-05-26 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Cross type focus points | - | 1 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 115 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/2s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | - | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 111g (0.24 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 370 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-80 | B740 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2-30 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $0 | $897 |