Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung SL102
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Alternate Name is ES55
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung SL102, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and the SL102 (10MP) is very similar but the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and SL102 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z270 was announced within a month of the SL102 and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-Z270 scores against the SL102 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 and Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery and Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Samsung SL102
| EX-Z270 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Casio EX-Z270
| SL102 | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung SL102
| EX-Z270 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2009 |  | January 2009 | Similar generation |
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z270 features outside dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL102 has specifications of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung SL102 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z270 compared to the SL102.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z270 and SL102 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to see the difference between sensor sizes merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z270 and SL102.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide the same megapixel count but not the same sensor sizes. The EX-Z270 contains the tinier sensor which should make achieving shallow DOF trickier.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung SL102 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ES55 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | - |
| Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" |
| Display resolution | 115k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash settings | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 111g (0.24 lb) | 116g (0.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-80 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $0 | $130 |