Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung ST600
96 Imaging
32 Features
22 Overall
28
95 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung ST600 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-135mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 150g - 104 x 60 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung ST600 Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung ST600, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Casio and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and ST600 (14MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and ST600 (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z270 was manufactured 12 months earlier than the ST600 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX-Z270 grades vs the ST600 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung ST600 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 & Samsung ST600. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery & Samsung ST600 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Samsung ST600
| EX-Z270 | ST600 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST600 over the Casio EX-Z270
| ST600 | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2010 | January 2009 | Newer by 12 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3.5" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
| Display resolution | 1152k | 115k | Crisper display (+1037k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung ST600
| EX-Z270 | ST600 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung ST600 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z270 offers physical measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Samsung ST600 has measurements of 104mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung ST600 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z270 vs the ST600.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z270 and ST600 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung ST600 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by looking at a spec sheet. The picture below might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z270 and ST600.
Clearly, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z270 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Samsung ST600 will give extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z270 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung ST600 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung ST600 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung ST600 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung ST600 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 4800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 27-135mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dots | 1,152 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 111 grams (0.24 lb) | 150 grams (0.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 104 x 60 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-80 | SLB07 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $0 | $330 |