Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung TL225
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
94 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Introduced August 2009
- Additionally referred to as ST550
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung TL225 Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung TL225, both Ultracompact cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and the TL225 (12MP) is pretty close but the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and TL225 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z270 was introduced 7 months prior to the TL225 and they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-Z270 scores against the TL225 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 & Samsung TL225. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery & Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Samsung TL225
| EX-Z270 | TL225 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Casio EX-Z270
| TL225 | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2009 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 7 months |
| Screen sizing | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 1152k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+1037k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung TL225
| EX-Z270 | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z270 has physical dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL225 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") with a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung TL225 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z270 and the TL225.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z270 and TL225 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to see the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through technical specs. The pic underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z270 and TL225.
As you can tell, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z270 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the Samsung TL225 will provide you with extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z270 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung TL225 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung TL225 |
| Also called as | - | ST550 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2009-08-13 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dot | 1,152 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 111 grams (0.24 pounds) | 187 grams (0.41 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $488 |