Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB1100F
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
67 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB1100F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-875mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 512g - 125 x 87 x 96mm
- Announced January 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB1100F Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB1100F, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and WB1100F (16MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and WB1100F (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z270 was unveiled 6 years prior to the WB1100F which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB1100F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a short overview of how the EX-Z270 scores vs the WB1100F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB1100F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 & Samsung WB1100F. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery & Samsung WB1100F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Samsung WB1100F
| EX-Z270 | WB1100F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB1100F over the Casio EX-Z270
| WB1100F | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 60 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung WB1100F
| EX-Z270 | WB1100F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB1100F Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z270 has exterior dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Samsung WB1100F has proportions of 125mm x 87mm x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") along with a weight of 512 grams (1.13 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB1100F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z270 compared to the WB1100F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z270 and WB1100F is 96 and 67 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB1100F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through technical specs. The image underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z270 and WB1100F.
As you can tell, each of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z270 using its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more challenging and the Samsung WB1100F will render more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z270 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB1100F Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB1100F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung WB1100F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung WB1100F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-875mm (35.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 115k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 111g (0.24 lbs) | 512g (1.13 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 125 x 87 x 96mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 3.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $0 | $250 |