Clicky

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB2200F

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
22
Overall
28
Casio Exilim EX-Z270 front
 
Samsung WB2200F front
Portability
59
Imaging
40
Features
48
Overall
43

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs

Casio EX-Z270
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
  • 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
  • Released January 2009
Samsung WB2200F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
  • Launched January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview

On this page, we are reviewing the Casio EX-Z270 versus Samsung WB2200F, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and WB2200F (16MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and WB2200F (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The EX-Z270 was manufactured 6 years earlier than the WB2200F which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-Z270 matches up versus the WB2200F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Samsung WB2200F

 EX-Z270 WB2200F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Casio EX-Z270

 WB2200F EX-Z270 
LaunchedJanuary 2014January 2009More modern by 60 months
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k115kSharper display (+345k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung WB2200F

 EX-Z270 WB2200F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z270 offers outside dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has measurements of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") with a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-Z270 versus Samsung WB2200F in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z270 and the WB2200F.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB2200F size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z270 and WB2200F is 96 and 59 respectively.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB2200F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its tough to envision the difference between sensor sizes only by reading specifications. The image here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z270 and WB2200F.

To sum up, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z270 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Samsung WB2200F will offer you extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z270 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB2200F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Portrait photography details
Samsung WB2200F Portrait photography details
19
manual focus not available
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
does not have RAW files
44
manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
comes with face detection focusing
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Street photography highlights
Samsung WB2200F Street photography highlights
57
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no articulating screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
does not have RAW files
40
image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
more heavy than competition (708 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-Z270
Sports photography with Samsung WB2200F
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
does not have phase detect AF
53
amazing zoom range (20-1200mm 60.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Travel photography info
Samsung WB2200F Travel photography info
58
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
resolution not great (10MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
51
resolution is good (16MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (20mm)
long reach (1200mm)
no Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (708g)
does not feature selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Landscape photography advice
Samsung WB2200F Landscape photography advice
31
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
manual focus not available
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
does not have RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
46
manual focus
fairly wide (20mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
no Timelapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Vlogging highlights
Samsung WB2200F Vlogging highlights
29
fairly wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
does not have selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone jack
25
fairly wide (20mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly display
no external microphone jack
more heavy than competition (708 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung WB2200F
 Casio Exilim EX-Z270Samsung WB2200F
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z270 Samsung WB2200F
Type Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2009-01-08 2014-01-07
Body design Ultracompact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 20-1200mm (60.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.6-7.8 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 10cm
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7" 3"
Resolution of display 115k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 200k dot
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1/2s 1/8s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed - 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 6.00 m (ISO Auto)
Flash options - Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 111g (0.24 lb) 708g (1.56 lb)
Physical dimensions 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-80 BP-1410
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) -
Time lapse recording
Storage media SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible SD, SDHC, SCXC
Storage slots Single Single
Retail price $0 $599