Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB250F
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5da/be5da3e0d8c97d11812a2fa106de287a4829ce6f" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z270 front Casio Exilim EX-Z270 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f3d0/6f3d00d7c30cb034b59ae160397ff233ae021e98" alt="Samsung WB250F front Samsung WB250F front"
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Casio EX-Z270 versus Samsung WB250F, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and WB250F (14MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and WB250F (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The EX-Z270 was manufactured 5 years prior to the WB250F and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a more detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-Z270 scores versus the WB250F for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 & Samsung WB250F. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Samsung WB250F
EX-Z270 | WB250F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Casio EX-Z270
WB250F | EX-Z270 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 48 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 115k | Clearer display (+345k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung WB250F
EX-Z270 | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z270 comes with exterior measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has measurements of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z270 versus Samsung WB250F in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z270 against the WB250F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef648/ef648f452f33405514ce15e9d5d72c56c75d2dae" alt="Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB250F size comparison Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB250F size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z270 and WB250F is 96 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1453c/1453c044a99b9172df70f342631108de3b0ed105" alt="Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB250F top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB250F top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing purely by checking out specs. The photograph here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z270 and WB250F.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z270 due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Samsung WB250F will provide more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z270 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62702/62702381b2b3388e4c7334fae9062e843d6bc5e4" alt="Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB250F sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB250F sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/308e6/308e63dbd6cbd671d179d7a7c6e80e9692d51366" alt="Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung WB250F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung WB250F |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 115 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 16 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 111 grams (0.24 pounds) | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $0 | $250 |