Clicky

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
96
Imaging
33
Features
22
Overall
28
Casio Exilim EX-Z270 front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Casio EX-Z270
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
  • 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
  • Released January 2009
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Revealed January 2014
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB350F Overview

Following is a complete review of the Casio EX-Z270 versus Samsung WB350F, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and WB350F (16MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and WB350F (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizes.

Photography Glossary

The EX-Z270 was launched 6 years earlier than the WB350F which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB350F being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z270 scores against the WB350F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Samsung WB350F

 EX-Z270 WB350F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Casio EX-Z270

 WB350F EX-Z270 
RevealedJanuary 2014January 2009More modern by 60 months
Focus manually Dial accurate focusing
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k115kSharper display (+345k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung WB350F

 EX-Z270 WB350F 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z270 offers physical measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Samsung WB350F has proportions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

Compare the Casio EX-Z270 versus Samsung WB350F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z270 against the WB350F.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z270 and WB350F is 96 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizes just by checking technical specs. The picture underneath will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z270 and WB350F.

As you have seen, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z270 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Samsung WB350F will give you greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z270 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB350F as a Portrait photography camera
19
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
40
manual focus
MP count decent (16MP)
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Street photography information
Samsung WB350F Street photography information
57
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
61
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition (276g)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Sports photography details
Samsung WB350F Sports photography details
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
lacks phase detect AF
50
amazing zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Travel photography information
Samsung WB350F Travel photography information
58
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
69
lighter than competition (276g)
MP count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (23mm)
very long zoom (483mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung WB350F Landscape photography highlights
31
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
manual exposure not available
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
lacks RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
50
manual focus
rather wide (23mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 Vlogging details
Samsung WB350F Vlogging details
29
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
does not feature selfie friendly display
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external microphone jack
34
rather wide (23mm)
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (276g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
lack of mic socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung WB350F
 Casio Exilim EX-Z270Samsung WB350F
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z270 Samsung WB350F
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2009-01-08 2014-01-07
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.5" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 5.744 x 4.308mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 24.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.6-7.8 f/2.8-5.9
Crop factor 6.3 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 115k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1/2 seconds 16 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1920 x 1080
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 111g (0.24 lb) 276g (0.61 lb)
Physical dimensions 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-80 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) -
Time lapse feature
Storage type SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots 1 1
Cost at launch $0 $260