Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB750
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Released September 2011
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung WB750, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and WB750 (13MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and WB750 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z270 was launched 3 years before the WB750 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB750 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-Z270 scores against the WB750 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 and Samsung WB750. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery and Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Samsung WB750
| EX-Z270 | WB750 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Casio EX-Z270
| WB750 | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2011 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 32 months |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung WB750
| EX-Z270 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z270 has got physical dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Samsung WB750 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z270 and Samsung WB750 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z270 vs the WB750.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z270 and WB750 is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements only by seeing a spec sheet. The visual here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z270 and WB750.
Clearly, both of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z270 because of its smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh trickier and the Samsung WB750 will show greater detail utilizing its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older EX-Z270 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z270 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Samsung WB750 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 115 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.30 m |
| Flash modes | - | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 111 gr (0.24 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-80 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $339 |