Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
96 Imaging
32 Features
22 Overall
28


82 Imaging
55 Features
30 Overall
45
Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Replacement is Sigma DP2 Merrill

Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Sigma. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and DP1 Merrill (15MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizing.

The EX-Z270 was brought out 4 years prior to the DP1 Merrill which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-Z270 matches up against the DP1 Merrill in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 and Sigma DP1 Merrill. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery and Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Sigma DP1 Merrill
EX-Z270 | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | " | Larger display (+2.7") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Casio EX-Z270
DP1 Merrill | EX-Z270 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 37 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 115k | Sharper display (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Sigma DP1 Merrill
EX-Z270 | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z270 features external measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Sigma DP1 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z270 compared to the DP1 Merrill.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z270 and DP1 Merrill is 96 and 82 respectively.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specifications. The pic underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z270 and DP1 Merrill.
Plainly, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z270 because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will render greater detail having its extra 5MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z270 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Sigma |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 15MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4704 x 3136 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | () |
Max aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/2.8 |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | - |
Screen resolution | 115k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 111 grams (0.24 lbs) | 330 grams (0.73 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $0 | $1,250 |