Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
96 Imaging
32 Features
22 Overall
28
70 Imaging
62 Features
38 Overall
52
Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Revealed February 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-Z270 and Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z270 was brought out 6 years before the DP2 Quattro which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the EX-Z270 grades against the DP2 Quattro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
| EX-Z270 | DP2 Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Casio EX-Z270
| DP2 Quattro | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 | January 2009 | Newer by 62 months | |
| Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 115k | Sharper screen (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
| EX-Z270 | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z270 comes with outside measurements of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z270 and Sigma DP2 Quattro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the EX-Z270 compared to the DP2 Quattro.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z270 and DP2 Quattro is 96 and 70 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions only by checking specs. The picture below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z270 and DP2 Quattro.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z270 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF harder and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will resolve extra detail having its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z270 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Sigma |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
| Type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TRUE III engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | f/2.8 |
| Crop factor | 6.3 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 111 grams (0.24 pounds) | 395 grams (0.87 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $0 | $931 |