Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
96 Imaging
33 Features
22 Overall
28


57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Introduced April 2012
- Older Model is Sigma SD1

Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Casio and Sigma. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and SD1 Merrill (15MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor size.

The EX-Z270 was announced 4 years before the SD1 Merrill and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summary of how the EX-Z270 matches up against the SD1 Merrill with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 and Sigma SD1 Merrill. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery and Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
EX-Z270 | SD1 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Casio EX-Z270
SD1 Merrill | EX-Z270 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 39 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 115k | Clearer display (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
EX-Z270 | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z270 enjoys outside dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) while the Sigma SD1 Merrill has specifications of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z270 vs the SD1 Merrill.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z270 and SD1 Merrill is 96 and 57 respectively.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by checking out technical specs. The graphic underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z270 and SD1 Merrill.
As you can tell, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z270 using its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will provide greater detail with its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics much more aggressively. The older EX-Z270 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z270 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Sigma |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Class | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2012-04-10 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual True II |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4800 x 3200 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 115 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 111 gr (0.24 lb) | 790 gr (1.74 lb) |
Dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $2,339 |