Casio EX-Z270 vs Sony A900
96 Imaging
32 Features
22 Overall
28
54 Imaging
65 Features
62 Overall
63
Casio EX-Z270 vs Sony A900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.8) lens
- 111g - 97 x 55 x 22mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Revealed October 2008
- Later Model is Sony A99
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z270 vs Sony A900 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-Z270 versus Sony A900, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Casio and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the EX-Z270 (10MP) and A900 (25MP) and the EX-Z270 (1/2.5") and A900 (Full frame) possess totally different sensor sizing.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe EX-Z270 was manufactured 3 months later than the A900 so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z270 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-Z270 scores versus the A900 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z270 vs Sony A900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z270 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A900. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z270 Gallery & Sony A900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z270 over the Sony A900
| EX-Z270 | A900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Casio EX-Z270
| A900 | EX-Z270 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 922k | 115k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z270 and Sony A900
| EX-Z270 | A900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2009 | October 2008 | Similar age | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z270 vs Sony A900 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z270 offers physical dimensions of 97mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 111 grams (0.24 lbs) whilst the Sony A900 has proportions of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z270 versus Sony A900 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z270 vs the A900.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z270 and A900 is 96 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Sony A900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to see the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through specifications. The visual here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z270 and A900.
Plainly, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z270 due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony A900 will resolve greater detail due to its extra 15 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots much more aggressively.
Casio EX-Z270 vs Sony A900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-Z270 vs Sony A900 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Sony |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z270 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2008-10-22 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.5" | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
| Sensor surface area | 24.7mm² | 861.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 25 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6048 x 4032 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/2.6-7.8 | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 6.3 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 111 gr (0.24 lbs) | 895 gr (1.97 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 55 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 79 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1431 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 880 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-80 | NP-FM500H |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
| Storage slots | Single | Two |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $2,736 |