Casio EX-Z280 vs Nikon S6300
96 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
![Casio Exilim EX-Z280 front Casio Exilim EX-Z280 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z280/Casio-EX-Z280-front.jpg)
![Nikon Coolpix S6300 front Nikon Coolpix S6300 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Nikon-Coolpix-S6300/Nikon-S6300-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z280 vs Nikon S6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 160g - 94 x 58 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z280 vs Nikon S6300 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-Z280 and Nikon S6300, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Casio and Nikon. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z280 (12MP) and S6300 (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The EX-Z280 was revealed 3 years before the S6300 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-Z280 grades versus the S6300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z280 vs Nikon S6300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z280 and Nikon Coolpix S6300. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z280 Gallery and Nikon S6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z280 over the Nikon S6300
EX-Z280 | S6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon S6300 over the Casio EX-Z280
S6300 | EX-Z280 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | ![]() | August 2009 | More modern by 29 months |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 115k | Sharper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z280 and Nikon S6300
EX-Z280 | S6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z280 vs Nikon S6300 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry around your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z280 comes with exterior measurements of 97mm x 53mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Nikon S6300 has measurements of 94mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z280 and Nikon S6300 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z280 vs the S6300.
![Casio EX-Z280 vs Nikon S6300 size comparison Casio EX-Z280 vs Nikon S6300 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z280-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S6300-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z280 and S6300 is 96 and 94 respectively.
![Casio EX-Z280 vs Nikon S6300 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z280 vs Nikon S6300 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z280-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S6300-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-Z280 vs Nikon S6300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes purely by researching specifications. The picture underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z280 and S6300.
Plainly, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You should count on the Nikon S6300 to render extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z280 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
![Casio EX-Z280 vs Nikon S6300 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z280 vs Nikon S6300 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z280-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S6300-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-Z280 vs Nikon S6300 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-Z280 vs Nikon S6300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z280 vs Nikon S6300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z280-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-S6300-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z280 vs Nikon S6300 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Nikon Coolpix S6300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Nikon |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Nikon Coolpix S6300 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-08-31 | 2012-02-01 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-104mm (4.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 115 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 6.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.20 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow-sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 133g (0.29 pounds) | 160g (0.35 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 94 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-80 | EN-EL12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $180 | $200 |