Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus Tough-3000
96 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
94 Imaging
34 Features
26 Overall
30
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Announced January 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 3000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus Tough-3000, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z280 (12MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is very close and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z280 was launched 4 months earlier than the Tough-3000 and they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-Z280 matches up against the Tough-3000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z280 and Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z280 Gallery and Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z280 over the Olympus Tough-3000
| EX-Z280 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Casio EX-Z280
| Tough-3000 | EX-Z280 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z280 and Olympus Tough-3000
| EX-Z280 | Tough-3000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2009 | January 2010 | Same generation | |
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal display dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z280 has got physical dimensions of 97mm x 53mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has specifications of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus Tough-3000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z280 and the Tough-3000.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z280 and Tough-3000 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to see the gap in sensor sizes just by viewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z280 and Tough-3000.
Clearly, the 2 cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same MP and you should expect comparable quality of pictures though you need to take the production date of the cameras into account.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
| Also referred to as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-08-31 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-104mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 115k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 133 grams (0.29 lb) | 159 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-80 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $180 | $0 |