Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus TG-320
96 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
94 Imaging
38 Features
33 Overall
36
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-Z280 versus Olympus TG-320, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-Z280 (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is pretty similar and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z280 was launched 3 years earlier than the TG-320 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the EX-Z280 scores vs the TG-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z280 & Olympus TG-320. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z280 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z280 over the Olympus TG-320
| EX-Z280 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Casio EX-Z280
| TG-320 | EX-Z280 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | August 2009 | More recent by 28 months |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z280 and Olympus TG-320
| EX-Z280 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z280 features outer dimensions of 97mm x 53mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z280 versus Olympus TG-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z280 vs the TG-320.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z280 and TG-320 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z280 and TG-320.
As you can see, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Olympus TG-320 to deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older EX-Z280 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2009-08-31 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-104mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 115 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 133g (0.29 lbs) | 155g (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 shots |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-80 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $180 | $0 |
