Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus VR-330
96 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
94 Imaging
36 Features
38 Overall
36
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus VR-320
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Casio EX-Z280 versus Olympus VR-330, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-Z280 (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z280 was launched 17 months before the VR-330 making them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the EX-Z280 matches up versus the VR-330 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z280 and Olympus VR-330. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z280 Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z280 over the Olympus VR-330
| EX-Z280 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Casio EX-Z280
| VR-330 | EX-Z280 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2011 |  | August 2009 | More modern by 17 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z280 and Olympus VR-330
| EX-Z280 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z280 comes with external dimensions of 97mm x 53mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-330 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z280 versus Olympus VR-330 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z280 against the VR-330.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z280 and VR-330 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizes just by seeing a spec sheet. The pic below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z280 and VR-330.
As you can see, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus VR-330 to show more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z280 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z280 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2009-08-31 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-104mm (4.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 115 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 133 gr (0.29 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-80 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $180 | $220 |