Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12
96 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efead/efeadc926fa641dfb6c25e82a731918fb19ebb47" alt="Casio Exilim EX-Z280 front Casio Exilim EX-Z280 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27f00/27f002f9b360b27dd43a21dfef0ba4e91344bfbc" alt="Ricoh GXR Mount A12 front Ricoh GXR Mount A12 front"
84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Announced August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview
In this write-up, we are contrasting the Casio EX-Z280 versus Ricoh GXR Mount A12, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-Z280 (12MP) and the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) is fairly similar but the EX-Z280 (1/2.3") and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) come with different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The EX-Z280 was introduced 23 months earlier than the GXR Mount A12 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z280 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-Z280 grades vs the GXR Mount A12 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z280 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z280 Gallery and Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z280 over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
EX-Z280 | GXR Mount A12 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Casio EX-Z280
GXR Mount A12 | EX-Z280 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2011 | ![]() | August 2009 | More recent by 23 months |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 115k | Clearer display (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z280 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
EX-Z280 | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z280 enjoys outside measurements of 97mm x 53mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has sizing of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z280 versus Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z280 against the GXR Mount A12.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1fbf0/1fbf0c6f887f8af371f12c00982827c760aa24a9" alt="Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 size comparison Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z280 and GXR Mount A12 is 96 and 84 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2f45/e2f45091239850ab7cc2186f5fa33e6a74a7fa04" alt="Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to picture the contrast between sensor measurements simply by going over specs. The graphic underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z280 and GXR Mount A12.
All in all, each of these cameras offer the same exact megapixels but different sensor measurements. The EX-Z280 uses the tinier sensor which is going to make getting shallow depth of field tougher. The older EX-Z280 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ec3f/7ec3ffe598da8d586d59d69f3f25b28803f19d2d" alt="Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f9f3/6f9f3eabf3fb80c67914ddd11436223032c23e23" alt="Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2009-08-31 | 2011-08-05 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-104mm (4.0x) | () |
Maximal aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 115k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/9000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.20 m | 9.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 133g (0.29 pounds) | 370g (0.82 pounds) |
Dimensions | 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-80 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (5 sec, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $180 | $349 |