Clicky

Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
21
Overall
29
Casio Exilim EX-Z280 front
 
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 front
Portability
84
Imaging
53
Features
39
Overall
47

Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z280
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
  • 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
  • Launched August 2009
Ricoh GXR Mount A12
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1/9000s Max Shutter
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
  • Announced August 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview

In this write-up, we are contrasting the Casio EX-Z280 versus Ricoh GXR Mount A12, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-Z280 (12MP) and the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) is fairly similar but the EX-Z280 (1/2.3") and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) come with different sensor sizing.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The EX-Z280 was introduced 23 months earlier than the GXR Mount A12 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z280 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-Z280 grades vs the GXR Mount A12 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z280 over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12

 EX-Z280 GXR Mount A12 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Casio EX-Z280

 GXR Mount A12 EX-Z280 
AnnouncedAugust 2011August 2009More recent by 23 months
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k115kClearer display (+805k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z280 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12

 EX-Z280 GXR Mount A12 
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison

For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z280 enjoys outside measurements of 97mm x 53mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has sizing of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-Z280 versus Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z280 against the GXR Mount A12.

Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z280 and GXR Mount A12 is 96 and 84 respectively.

Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be hard to picture the contrast between sensor measurements simply by going over specs. The graphic underneath might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z280 and GXR Mount A12.

All in all, each of these cameras offer the same exact megapixels but different sensor measurements. The EX-Z280 uses the tinier sensor which is going to make getting shallow depth of field tougher. The older EX-Z280 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-Z280
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR Mount A12
27
manual focus
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
55
manual focus
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview feature
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z280 Street photography features
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Street photography features
55
lighter than others (133 grams)
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
65
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z280 Sports photography details
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sports photography details
17
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
39
great max shutter speed (1/9,000 seconds)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
fixed focal length (()mm)
no liveview feature
max fps low (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
lacks phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z280 Travel photography information
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Travel photography information
62
lighter than others (133 grams)
built-in flash
rather wide (26mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
low MP (12MP)
does not have selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
60
built-in flash
good maximum aperture (f)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly display
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z280 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 as a Landscape photography camera
32
manual focus
rather wide (26mm)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
small screen (2.7 inch)
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
lack of Time Lapse recording
52
manual focus
good maximum aperture (f)
good sized screen (3")
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
no liveview feature
no image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z280 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Vlogging highlights
28
rather wide (26mm)
lighter than others (133 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
does not have selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic port
26
good maximum aperture (f)
does not contain selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have mic jack
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z280 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
 Casio Exilim EX-Z280Ricoh GXR Mount A12
General Information
Make Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z280 Ricoh GXR Mount A12
Class Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2009-08-31 2011-08-05
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 2848
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 64 200
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-104mm (4.0x) ()
Maximal aperture f/2.6-5.9 -
Macro focusing distance 5cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.7 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 115k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 1 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/9000 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 3.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.20 m 9.60 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 133g (0.29 pounds) 370g (0.82 pounds)
Dimensions 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 330 shots
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-80 DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) Yes (5 sec, custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Retail price $180 $349