Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
96 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28


85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Introduced March 2010

Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Casio EX-Z280 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-Z280 (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is relatively well matched but the EX-Z280 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") boast different sensor measurements.

The EX-Z280 was revealed 6 months earlier than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z280 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-Z280 grades versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z280 & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z280 Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z280 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
EX-Z280 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Casio EX-Z280
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | EX-Z280 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 115k | Clearer screen (+805k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z280 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
EX-Z280 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2009 | ![]() | March 2010 | Similar age |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z280 enjoys external measurements of 97mm x 53mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z280 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z280 vs the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z280 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 96 and 85 respectively.

Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing merely by checking a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z280 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you can see, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z280 using its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Casio EX-Z280 will resolve extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively.

Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-08-31 | 2010-03-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-104mm (4.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 115k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 180 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.20 m | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 133g (0.29 lbs) | 355g (0.78 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-80 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $180 | $349 |