Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
96 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-Z280 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z280 (12MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z280 was released 5 years prior to the WG-4 GPS and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the EX-Z280 grades versus the WG-4 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z280 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z280 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z280 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| EX-Z280 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Casio EX-Z280
| WG-4 GPS | EX-Z280 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | August 2009 | Fresher by 53 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+345k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z280 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| EX-Z280 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z280 has physical dimensions of 97mm x 53mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z280 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z280 versus the WG-4 GPS.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z280 and WG-4 GPS is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing purely by researching specs. The photograph here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z280 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to result in more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The older EX-Z280 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-08-31 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-104mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 115 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 133 gr (0.29 lb) | 235 gr (0.52 lb) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 images |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-80 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $180 | $210 |