Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-50
96 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
- Announced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Lets look closer at the Casio EX-Z280 versus Ricoh WG-50, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the EX-Z280 (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z280 was introduced 8 years earlier than the WG-50 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-Z280 grades versus the WG-50 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z280 and Ricoh WG-50. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z280 Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z280 over the Ricoh WG-50
| EX-Z280 | WG-50 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-Z280
| WG-50 | EX-Z280 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2017 |  | August 2009 | Fresher by 94 months |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z280 and Ricoh WG-50
| EX-Z280 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z280 features outside dimensions of 97mm x 53mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z280 versus Ricoh WG-50 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z280 versus the WG-50.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z280 and WG-50 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing just by viewing specifications. The photograph underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z280 and WG-50.
Plainly, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-50 to result in more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older EX-Z280 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-Z280 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2009-08-31 | 2017-05-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-104mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 115k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.20 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 133 grams (0.29 lbs) | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-80 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $180 | $280 |