Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung SL202
96 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-104mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 133g - 97 x 53 x 20mm
- Introduced August 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL50
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
The following is a detailed assessment of the Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z280 (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is pretty well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z280 was announced 7 months after the SL202 so they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the EX-Z280 matches up versus the SL202 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z280 and Samsung SL202. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z280 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z280 over the Samsung SL202
| EX-Z280 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2009 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 7 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Casio EX-Z280
| SL202 | EX-Z280 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z280 and Samsung SL202
| EX-Z280 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z280 provides outer dimensions of 97mm x 53mm x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") with a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung SL202 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-Z280 vs the SL202.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z280 and SL202 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specs. The image here will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z280 and SL202.
All in all, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Casio EX-Z280 to resolve more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more modern EX-Z280 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z280 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z280 | Samsung SL202 |
| Otherwise known as | - | PL50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-08-31 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-104mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 115 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.20 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 133g (0.29 lb) | 168g (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 97 x 53 x 20mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-80 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $180 | $140 |